LNG Canada Doubles Capacity as Asia Looks Beyond the Gulf

Shell’s LNG Canada Phase 2 FID doubles capacity but faces fierce global competition.

What the company is saying

Shell, together with PETRONAS, PetroChina, Mitsubishi Corporation, and KOGAS, has approved the Final Investment Decision for LNG Canada Phase 2, doubling the facility’s capacity to 28 million tons per annum. The announcement frames this as a strategic move to position Canada as a major long-term LNG supplier to Asia, emphasizing geographic advantages and shorter shipping times to Tokyo (8–9 days from British Columbia versus 16–18 from the U.S. Gulf Coast). The company highlights the role of the newly built Coastal GasLink pipeline, delivering 2.1 billion cubic feet per day to the Kitimat terminal, and stresses the cleaner energy profile of Canadian LNG, with Cedar LNG designed to run entirely on renewable hydroelectricity. The narrative is supported by Wood Mackenzie’s projection that Asian LNG demand will double to 500 mtpa by 2060, but also acknowledges that even with new projects like Ksi Lisims LNG (12 mtpa), Canada will fall short of the 100 mtpa export goal. The tone is optimistic about Canada’s competitive edge but concedes that the window to capture Asian market share is narrowing as rival projects in the U.S., Africa, and Latin America advance.

What the data suggests

The FID for LNG Canada Phase 2 is a concrete milestone, doubling the terminal’s capacity to 28 mtpa. With Cedar LNG and Woodfibre under construction, Canada’s expected LNG export capacity is projected at 33 mtpa by decade’s end. The Coastal GasLink pipeline is operational, supplying 2.1 billion cubic feet per day to the Kitimat terminal. Shipping times from British Columbia to Tokyo are 8–9 days, significantly shorter than the 16–18 days from the U.S. Gulf Coast, offering a logistical advantage. In the first half of 2026, U.S. LNG shipments to Asia increased by 108% year-on-year, reflecting surging Asian demand and a shift away from Middle Eastern cargoes. Oil prices have climbed above $110, underlining the market’s sensitivity to supply disruptions. Wood Mackenzie projects Asian LNG demand will double from 260 mtpa to 500 mtpa by 2060, but Canada’s current and planned projects will not meet the aspirational 100 mtpa export target. The data is robust on operational scale and market context but lacks financial metrics such as capex, expected returns, or project-level economics.

Analysis

The announcement's tone is positive, highlighting the approval of the Final Investment Decision (FID) for LNG Canada Phase 2, which is a concrete milestone. However, most of the benefits—such as doubling capacity to 28 mtpa and contributing to Canada's expected 33 mtpa LNG export capacity by decade's end—are forward-looking and will not be realised for several years. The disclosure is operationally detailed but omits any profitability, cash flow, or capital expenditure figures, preventing assessment of near-term financial impact. The narrative is further inflated by referencing long-term market projections (e.g., Asian LNG demand doubling by 2060) and Canada's aspirational 100 mtpa export goal, which is not supported by current project commitments. The capital intensity is high, with major infrastructure under construction and FID just approved, but immediate earnings impact is not addressed. Overall, the gap between narrative and evidence is moderate: the FID is a real milestone, but most benefits are long-dated and financial returns are unquantified.

Risk flags

• ●Execution risk is significant: doubling LNG Canada’s capacity and bringing Cedar LNG and Woodfibre online by decade’s end require timely construction, regulatory approvals, and successful commissioning. Delays or cost overruns could erode Canada’s competitive window.
• ●Competitive risk is intensifying: U.S. projects like CP2 LNG, Commonwealth LNG, and Delfin FLNG 1 have already reached FID this year, and new African, Latin American, and Australian LNG projects are advancing, threatening Canada’s ability to secure Asian market share.
• ●Market risk is present: While Wood Mackenzie projects Asian LNG demand will double by 2060, actual contract capture is not guaranteed, and Canada’s total planned capacity remains well below the 100 mtpa target, limiting upside if rivals move faster.
• ●Disclosure risk exists: The announcement provides detailed operational and market context but omits financial metrics such as capital expenditure, expected returns, or project-level economics, making it difficult for investors to assess the financial impact or risk-adjusted value.

Bottom line

Shell’s approval of the LNG Canada Phase 2 FID is a major operational milestone that will double the terminal’s capacity to 28 mtpa and, together with Cedar LNG and Woodfibre, could lift Canada’s LNG export capacity to 33 mtpa by the end of the decade. The project leverages Canada’s Pacific coast location and the Coastal GasLink pipeline’s 2.1 bcf/d supply to offer faster, potentially lower-cost LNG shipments to Asia, where demand is projected to double by 2060. However, the window to secure Asian contracts is narrowing as U.S., African, and Latin American competitors accelerate their own projects. The absence of disclosed financial metrics leaves the earnings impact and capital efficiency unclear. Investors should focus on project execution, cost discipline, and contract wins over the next three years, as timely delivery and market capture will determine whether this expansion translates into shareholder value.

Announcement summary

(NYSE:SHEL) Shell, together with PETRONAS, PetroChina, Mitsubishi Corporation, and KOGAS, has officially approved the Final Investment Decision (FID) for the LNG Canada Phase 2 expansion project. This expansion will double the facility's capacity to 28 million tons per annum (mtpa). Cedar LNG and Woodfibre, both under construction, are also contributing to Canada's expected LNG export capacity of 33 mtpa by the end of the decade. The Coastal GasLink pipeline has been built to deliver 2.1 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of natural gas to the LNG Canada export terminal in Kitimat, British Columbia. LNG Canada's terminal location on the Pacific coast allows tankers to avoid the Panama Canal and Middle East chokepoints, with cargoes from British Columbia reaching Tokyo in about 8 to 9 days, compared to 16 to 18 days from the U.S. Gulf Coast. In the first half of 2026, U.S. LNG shipments to Asia more than doubled (+108%) from the same period in 2025, as Asian buyers sought non-Middle Eastern cargoes. LNG Canada uses gas to drive its liquefaction trains and draws on BC Hydro for about a fifth of its energy needs, while Cedar LNG is designed to run entirely on renewable hydroelectricity from BC Hydro. Wood Mackenzie projects Asian LNG demand will double from approximately 260 mtpa today to around 500 mtpa by 2060. Even with the addition of projects such as the 12 mtpa Ksi Lisims LNG, Canada will fall short of the long-term goal of achieving 100 mtpa of LNG export capacity. American projects like CP2 LNG, Commonwealth LNG, and Delfin FLNG 1, which reached FID this year, are set to extend U.S. dominance in global LNG exports. New LNG infrastructure and export projects are also progressing in Africa, Latin America, and Australia, with countries such as Mozambique, Nigeria, Mauritania, Senegal, Mexico, Argentina, and Russia developing significant LNG export capabilities. Oil prices have climbed above $110 as Middle East supply fears persist.

Disagree with this article?